blog til et studium av uformelle tankfeil

tankefeil [eng. fallacy - av lat. fallax - bedrag]. De er argumenter. De brukes i all slags debatt. De overtaler, men burde ikke overbevise. De er ukorrekt argumenter som pÃ¥ en besnÃ¦rende og bedragersk mÃ¥te tilsynelatende gir stÃ¸tte for sin konklusjon.

Ian Johnson inndeling - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Her er en mte ordne inndele utfra et kristent perspektiv - fra Johnson's Christian Reunion site http:www.angelfire.comks2fallacies Tankefeil ----- ERRONEOUS METHODS OF INFERENCE ---- Fallacy of the Appeal to Authority --- Argument ad Hominem Fallacy ---- Inverted Syllogism Fallacy ---- Fallacious SyllogismNon Sequitur ..
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204063118_ian_johnson_inndeling.html

Richardson's inndeling - (Found July 8, 2008 )

A. Stephen Richardson, synes bygger p Encyclopedia Britannica med sin inndeling.http:mason.gmu.edu%7Earichar6logic.htmN_3_ Tankefeil ---- material fallacies ---- False Cause ---- Hasty Generalization ---- Misapplied Generalization ---- False Dilemma ---- Compound Question ---- False Analogy ---- Contradictory..
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204063429__richardsons_inndeling.html

LEO's inndeling - (Found July 8, 2008 )

LEO: Literacy Education Online- typical fallacies as divided into five major categories http:leo.stcloudstate.eduacadwritelogic.html Logical Fallacies ---- feelings ---- Appeal to Force ---- Appeal to Pity ---- Appeal to Gallery ---- Appeal to Authority ---- Old is Better ...
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204063755_leos__inndeling.html

def: Baldwin 1901 - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Fra DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY AND PSYCHOLOGY - av JAMES MARK BALDWIN (1901)Fallacy Lat. fallere, to deceive: Ger. Beweis-Fehler, Schluss-Fehler, Fallacie; Fr. sophisme; Ital. sofisma. Fallacy is any violation of the conditions of proof, any failure to conform to the laws of valid reasoning. As each condition of proof may be violated, the only complete description of fallacy would be given as an enumeration of the forms assumed by such violations. Concrete reasoning, involving generally a complex.
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204073022_james_mark_baldwin_.html

Def - Britanica 1911 - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Fra den bermte 1911-utgaven av Encyclopedia Britanica: FALLACY (Lat. fall-ax, apt to mislead), the term given generally to any mistaken statement used in argument; in Logic, technically, an argument which violates the laws of correct demonstration.. An argument may be fallacious in ,matier (i.e. misstatement of facts), in wording (i.e. wrong use of words), or in the process of inference. Fallacies have, therefore, been classified as: I. Material, IL Verbal, III. Logical or Formal; II. and III...
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204073153_1911_utgaven_av_britannica.html

Def: Ordboksdefinisjoner - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Fallacious - The American Heritage Concise Dictionary - Houghton Mifflin Company1. Containing or based on a fallacy.2. Tending to mislead; deceptive.Fallacy - The Penguin English Dictionary - Penguin1. a false idea: the popular fallacy that scientists are illiterate.2. in logic, an argument failing to satisfy the conditions of valid inference.Latin fallacia, from fallac-, fallax deceitful, from fallere to deceivefallacy - The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Houghton MifflinA false or...
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204075125_def_ordboksdefinisjoner.html

Diskusjoner av begrepet tankefeil - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Diverser diskusjoner av begrepet tankefeil p nettet Artikkelen Informal Logic i Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Bruce Thompsons diskusjon What is a Fallacy Magne Reitans ved Filosofisk Institutt, NTNU har publisert sin bok "Logikk og argumentasjonsteori p nettet. Et eget kapittel - Kapittel 6: Feilslutninger og fallgruver - handler om tankefeil. Magne Reiten bruker navnet feilsutninger p fenomenet, som kan skape den misforstelse at tankefeil er det samme som formallogiske feilaktige...
http://torkill.weblogg.no/260204075730_def_diskusjoner.html

Arg. scenarier 3 - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Argument From SignArgumentet har formen Premiss: A is true in this situationPremiss: Event B is generally indicated as true when its sign, A, is true in this kind of situationKonklusjon: B is true in this situation kritisk sprsml What is the strength of the correlation between A and B Are there any events other than B that would more reliably account for A Argument from ExampleArgumentet har formen Premiss: In this case, the individual a has property F and also property GPremiss: a is typical.
http://torkill.weblogg.no/120304170556_waltons_argumentasjonsscenarier_.html

Arg. scenarier 2 - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Argument from AnalogyArgumentet har formen Premiss: Generally, case C1 is similar to case C2Premiss: A is true (false) in case C1Konklusjon: A is true (false) in case C2 kritisk sprsml Are C1 and C2 similar in the respect cited Is A true (false) in C1 Are there differences between C1 and C2 that would tend to undermine the force of the similarity cited Is there some other case C3 that is also similar to C1, but in which A is false (true) Argument from WasteArgumentet har formen Premiss: If a..
http://torkill.weblogg.no/120304170718_waltons_argumentasjonsscenarier_.html

Arg. scenarier 1 - (Found July 8, 2008 )

Precedent Slippery Slope ArgumentArgumentet har formen Premiss: Case C0 would set a precedent with respect to an existing rule RPremiss: Case C0 is similar to case C1, that is, if C0 is held to be an exception to R, then C1 must be held to be an exception too (in order to be consistent in treating equal cases alike). A sequence of similar pairs Ci, Cj binds us by case-to-case consistency to the series, C0, C1, ..., CnPremiss: Having to accept case Cn as a precedent, or as a recgnized exception..
http://torkill.weblogg.no/120304170804_waltons_argumentasjonsscenarier_.html