Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of metadata (was Re: code repository) by Chaim Frenkel- September 8, 2000 >>>>> "AT" == Adam Turoff <ziggypanix.com> writes:AT> that is lost is who actually made any specific update; all changesAT> are made by &39;cvs-bot&39; or somesuch.Is this a programming issue or something more fundemental.(is it time and effort or a mismatch between perforce and CVS)<chaim>-- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.chaimfpobox.com +1-718-236-0183http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.source.control/2000/09/msg5.html Re: code repository by Adam Turoff- September 8, 2000 On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 10:24:05AM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:> I&39;m really sorry to see people so anxious to favour commercial,> proprietary tools, even in this arena, ...It isn&39;t about favoritism. It isn&39;t about commercial vs. open source.Perl is a pragmatic language. Perforce is a pragmatic choice. That&39;swhy it&39;s used for Perl5, and that&39;s why those who patch Perl prefer it.Z.http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.source.control/2000/09/msg4.html Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of metadata (was Re: code repository) by Adam Turoff- September 8, 2000 On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:> Adam Turoff wrote:> > > : Sarathy tells me that Perforce sucks at maintaining thousands of> > anonymous checkouts, while CVS doesn&39;t mind at all. This is a perfect> > reason to use anon CVS vs. Perforce, but does not require that Perforce be> > ditched in favor of CVS, only that an anon CVS gateway be maintained.> > Will this anonymous gateway have all the relevant meta-data Will it...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.source.control/2000/09/msg3.html Re: Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of metadata (wasRe: code repository) by Dan Sugalski- September 8, 2000 At 11:30 AM 9800 -0400, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:>Adam Turoff wrote:>> > : Sarathy tells me that Perforce sucks at maintaining thousands of> > anonymous checkouts, while CVS doesn&39;t mind at all. This is a perfect> > reason to use anon CVS vs. Perforce, but does not require that Perforce be> > ditched in favor of CVS, only that an anon CVS gateway be maintained.>>Will this anonymous gateway have all the relevant meta-data Will it look,>to a user of the...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.source.control/2000/09/msg2.html Can perforce gateway to CVS without loss of metadata (was Re: code repository) by Bradley M. Kuhn- September 8, 2000 Adam Turoff wrote:> : Sarathy tells me that Perforce sucks at maintaining thousands of> anonymous checkouts, while CVS doesn&39;t mind at all. This is a perfect> reason to use anon CVS vs. Perforce, but does not require that Perforce be> ditched in favor of CVS, only that an anon CVS gateway be maintained.Will this anonymous gateway have all the relevant meta-data Will it look,to a user of the gateway, like the live repository is CVS when they gohunting through metadata-- Bradley..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.source.control/2000/09/msg1.html |