perl.perl6.meta...nntp interface to the perl.org mailinglists by Ask Bjoern Hansen- July 8, 2001 Hi,I am putting up a nntp interface to the perl.org mailinglists(actually, to the ezmlm archives).I can&39;t quite decide if I should just create all groups asperl.listname, or if I should munge it to make a little more systemwhere I can. (say, perl6 lists will go as perl.perl6.meta, macperllists as perl.macperl.porters etc).What do you people think(what I have so far can be tried out at news:onion.perl.org, if youhave any problems with it, please let me know). - ask-- ask bjoern hansen,...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.meta/2001/07/msg963.html Re: http:dev.perl.org by Simon Cozens- July 8, 2001 On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:58:03PM -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:> A while ago Nathan wrote some more information about Perl6 and I> finally got around to "modernize" the dev.perl.org site (so it uses> mason and mod_perl now) and put it on.Wow. Really cool. Thanks, Nat and Ask. One note: Bryan is valiantlydoing the Perl 6 summaries on his own for the moment, as I am rathertuit-restricted at the moment.-- I forgot that I was that smart! -- Ilya Zakharevichhttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.meta/2001/07/msg962.html Re: OT Re: Perl Doesn't Suck by David L. Nicol- July 3, 2001 Stephen Zander wrote:> OpenSource. Try writing a second Perl implementation from scratch.Well it&39;s a dicier proposition that writing a Fortran or COBOL implementation from scratch, but it&39;s Not Intractable. The nextassertion might come as a small shock to you but Larry isn&39;t god.Topaz worked, didn&39;t it> Were something dreadful to happen to Larry and his estate chose to> change the licensing terms of the current implementation, where> would Perl6 go Or even Perl5 for...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.meta/2001/07/msg961.html Re: Perl Doesn't Suck by Elaine -HFB- Ashton- July 2, 2001 abigail abigailfoad.org quoth:>>Blech. Sun didn&39;t force you to run either Linux, or to use a PPC platform.>It&39;s your choice, and blaming Sun to screw you doesn&39;t make much sense.Well, it&39;s the Advocate or Asshole dilemma.http:www.perl.compuba200012advocacy.htmlThe conclusion bears reading more than once.e.http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.meta/2001/07/msg960.html Re: Perl Doesn't Suck by Abigail- July 2, 2001 On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 06:59:07PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:> > As a Solaris gal, this might all seem perfectly sensible. Myself, I&39;m> doubly screwed running Linux (which is not Windows or Solaris) on a> PowerPC (which is not Intel or Sparc). Sun might have perfectly valid> business reasons for concentrating on Solaris and Windows, but in the> end it still means I&39;m screwed.Blech. Sun didn&39;t force you to run either Linux, or to use a PPC platform.It&39;s your..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.meta/2001/07/msg959.html OT Re: Perl Doesn't Suck by Stephen Zander- July 2, 2001 >>>>> "schwern" == schwern <schwernpobox.com> writes: schwern> Sun doesn&39;t give out its JDK source code freely, they schwern> have all sorts of restrictions. If I wanted to port the schwern> JDK I can do it, but I need special permission from Sun schwern> to distribute it. This Sucks. Especially considering schwern> that you could go through a whole lot of work and then schwern> have Sun deny you.Speaking as someone with..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.meta/2001/07/msg958.html |