Incorrect guessing the part of CPANTS by Andy Lester- June 19, 2008 I looked around at the CPANTS assessment of ack. It&39;s got some big errors. It thinks that the Util I ship in t for the help of tests is a Util in another distro. See http:cpants.perl.orgdistprereqack CPANTS thinks that Win32::File is a prerequisite, when it very specifically is not. The require for Win32::File is in an eval, so it is fine if it doesn&39;t exist. See http:cpants.perl.orgdistkwaliteeack The overview complains about lack of examples and POD coverage. ...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6634.html Re: Must exist, right by Aristotle Pagaltzis- June 19, 2008 Eric Wilhelm <scratchcomputinggmail.com> 2008-06-19 10:15:> But even with C::A::Classy, I&39;ve had troubles with perception.> I just got a project (which I originally architected) set in> front of me for the second time after the client&39;s in-house guy> decided that he didn&39;t understand C::A::Classy and opted to> tear it out and replace it with a beta in-house thing that> doesn&39;t really even try to have most of the features of an> object system - thereby...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6633.html Re: Must exist, right by Eric Wilhelm- June 19, 2008 from Burak Gursoy on Thursday 19 June 2008 00:30:>I think Moose is overkill for this type of thing but Andy++ for this> thread, I&39;ve been looking for something like this for a while too :)Not sure about the "overkill" perception.Of course, I&39;ve been comfortably running Class::Accessor::Classy for a while and have often thought of adding something like this to it -- at which point something is probably overkill compared to coming back up-to-speed on Moose.But even with...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6632.html RE: Must exist, right by Burak Gursoy- June 19, 2008 I think Moose is overkill for this type of thing but Andy++ for this thread,I&39;ve been looking for something like this for a while too :)-----Original Message-----From: Andy Armstrong mailto:andyhexten.net Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 3:23 AMTo: Eric WilhelmCc: module-authorsperl.orgSubject: Re: Must exist, rightOn 19 Jun 2008, at 01:14, Eric Wilhelm wrote:> You want something like Object::Accessor, but without needing to> actually create the objectYup. I want a read-only object with...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6631.html Re: Must exist, right by Andy Armstrong- June 18, 2008 On 19 Jun 2008, at 03:18, Chris Dolan wrote:> Implemented! See the attached .pm file and the test.pl file that > verifies the four snipped use cases. It could certainly be made > more readable, but my interest is waning quickly. :-) I hereby > grant anyone permission to useextend this crappy code under the > same license terms as Perl itself.Heh. I can see this going all FizzBuzz :)-- Andy Armstrong, Hextenhttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6630.html Re: Template oriented module by Ivan Wills- June 18, 2008 On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 6:44 AM, Ivan Wills <ivan.willsgmail.com> wrote:> Hi,>> I have been working on converting a script that I have been using for my> self for a while which I use as a templating engine in vim and for creating> whole new files (and soon creating whole directory trees from templates). It> uses template toolkit for the actual templates.>> I have several questions about this before I try to put the module on CPAN> first what should I call this...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6629.html Re: Must exist, right by Chris Dolan- June 18, 2008 On Jun 18, 2008, at 6:35 PM, Andy Armstrong wrote:> I assume there&39;s a module that works like thissnip> It&39;s got to exist, right I had a look but there are so many > (:ObjectData)::. modules that it&39;s a bit hard to see the wood > for the trees :)>> --> Andy Armstrong, Hexten>Implemented! See the attached .pm file and the test.pl file that verifies the four snipped use cases. It could certainly be made more readable, but my interest is waning quickly. :-) .http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6628.html Re: Must exist, right by Andy Armstrong- June 18, 2008 On 19 Jun 2008, at 01:18, David Nicol wrote:> Considering that Data::Dumper is entirely regular in how it will> present a deconstruction of the data structure, and you have a clear> concept of how you wish the example structure ===> accessor set thing> to work, it&39;s certainly possible, and would take maybe two hacking> sessions to get right (provided you don&39;t get swept into the lake by a> mini-tsunami.)Yeah, I&39;ve been sort of passively thinking about how to do it..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6627.html Re: Must exist, right by Andy Armstrong- June 18, 2008 On 19 Jun 2008, at 01:14, Eric Wilhelm wrote:> You want something like Object::Accessor, but without needing to> actually create the objectYup. I want a read-only object with dynamically generated per object methods that reflect the internal data structure.> Assuming you could be bothered to call new() for the sub-object > (passing> it to the contructor, etc), just about anything including Moose would> work ;-) I&39;ll let the more Moose-enabled folks comment on how> a...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6626.html Re: Must exist, right by David Nicol- June 18, 2008 Considering that Data::Dumper is entirely regular in how it willpresent a deconstruction of the data structure, and you have a clearconcept of how you wish the example structure ===> accessor set thingto work, it&39;s certainly possible, and would take maybe two hackingsessions to get right (provided you don&39;t get swept into the lake by amini-tsunami.)It seems like something that might not exist already, as the need toshare that kind of meta-abstraction is felt by only extreme...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.module-authors/2008/06/msg6625.html |