My Soft Parade: CommentsBlog commentsOscar: WebAlchemy vs StaticGenerator- June 19, 2008 nginx has much better support for rewrite-rules, much more like Apache, while lighttpd is a bit more limited. I'll try this out, seems really cool :)http://www.mysoftparade.com/blog/webalchemy-vs-staticgenerator/#c130 Bernard: WebAlchemy accelerates Django in 100 times- June 10, 2008 Thanks for your reply Dima, as I mentioned above, I have added a rule in the webalchemy_settings.py file. But it still gives the ignored header.http://www.mysoftparade.com/blog/webalchemy-django-apache/#c129 Dima Dogadaylo: WebAlchemy accelerates Django in 100 times- June 9, 2008 Bernard, if you see "WebAlchemy: ignored" header, then you need to add proper rule for given view in webalchemy_settings.py.http://www.mysoftparade.com/blog/webalchemy-django-apache/#c128 Bernard: WebAlchemy accelerates Django in 100 times- June 8, 2008 this didn't quite come out right with the brackets resolve(request.path)0 function popular at 0x019CC2F0 self.get_binded_views() set(function popular at 0x0199F470) thanks in advance!http://www.mysoftparade.com/blog/webalchemy-django-apache/#c127 Bernard: WebAlchemy accelerates Django in 100 times- June 8, 2008 Hi Dima, This seems like a great piece of software and I'm trying to integrate it into one of my projects. I've run in to a problem that I don't quite understand(I'm still learning python). When I look at the headers, it always comes up as "WebAlchemy: ignored". You mentioned that this probably means that I haven't binded the method to the model yet. However after looking at the source, I found that "view in self.get_binded_views()" the process_response function inside the Site object always.http://www.mysoftparade.com/blog/webalchemy-django-apache/#c126 |