election-methods-list mailing listEmail archive for election-methods-list.Re: EM Saari's Basic Argument- March 5, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09213.html Re: EM Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09212.html Re: EM Who did you say won- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09211.html Re: EM Who did you say won- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09210.html EM Vermont IRV can elect a fanatical candidate- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09209.html Re: EM Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09208.html MMC vs "25%" slippage checkboxes (was Re: EM Blake's Margins Arguments- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09207.html RE: EM Who did you say won- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09206.html EM Markus: MMC. Why WV vs Margins matters.- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09205.html Re: 3-valued Booleans inside rules, passing Condorcet (Re: EM "More often" (was: IRV and Condorcet operating identically)- March 4, 2003http://www.mail-archive.com/election-methods-list@eskimo.com/msg09204.html |