perl.qa...Re: Making CPAN ratings easy (was Re: CPAN Ratings and the problem of choice) by Todd Rinaldo- June 30, 2008 I just wish it would remember my login between browser re-starts. Andwhat&39;s with the invalid certificate anywaysOn Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <gregendpoint.com> wrote:> On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:17:40 +1000> Paul Fenwick <pjfperltraining.com.au> wrote:>>> "Continue to the Bitcard service to login. It will send you>> back here when you are done registering and logging in.">> Oooh, good point, I forgot all about..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg11002.html Re: great search.cpan.org ideas by Andy Lester- June 30, 2008 On Jun 30, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:> All suggestions involving search.cpan.org fall in the category that> nobody can do anything about (except asking Graham Barr to do it.)Right. Which is another reason I&39;ve started up rethinking-cpan. I&39;m going to be more stuff on that so that I am prepped for OSCON BOFing on it.--Andy Lester => andypetdance.com => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdancehttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg11001.html Re: great search.cpan.org ideas by Eric Wilhelm- June 30, 2008 from Paul Fenwick on Monday 30 June 2008 17:17:>Let&39;s pretend you&39;re J. Average Hacker. You&39;ve popped over to CPAN...> http:search.cpan.orgsartakMoose-0.51libMoose.pmLet&39;s pretend you&39;re J. Average Hacker. You&39;ve been told that http:search.cpan.org is "CPAN"...Game over. ENOSOURCECODEAll suggestions involving search.cpan.org fall in the category that nobody can do anything about (except asking Graham Barr..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg11000.html Re: Making CPAN ratings easy (was Re: CPAN Ratings and the problemof choice) by Greg Sabino Mullane- June 30, 2008 On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:17:40 +1000Paul Fenwick <pjfperltraining.com.au> wrote:> "Continue to the Bitcard service to login. It will send you> back here when you are done registering and logging in."Oooh, good point, I forgot all about the nasty, ugly, bitcard registeringbit. Put that way, perhaps 29 reviews isn&39;t so bad after all.> There&39;s a button marked favourite. It looks like a star. I press it.Or perhaps just a generic one to five star point-n-click...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg10999.html Re: The uselessness of arbitrary Metric gaming by Aristotle Pagaltzis- June 30, 2008 David Cantrell <davidcantrell.org.uk> 2008-07-01 00:05:> Surely you can at least check that all POD is "well-formed"> without running any code from the distribution in questionNot entirely, although in retrospect that doesn’t matter.The issue is that if you have multi-line strings or heredocs orother such multi-line special constructs, perl may parse the filedifferently from a naïve POD parser. However, that doesn’t reallymatter, as all POD parsers used...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg10998.html Re: The uselessness of arbitrary Metric gaming by Aristotle Pagaltzis- June 30, 2008 Eric Wilhelm <scratchcomputinggmail.com> 2008-07-01 00:15:> from Aristotle Pagaltzis> on Monday 30 June 2008 14:42:>>> But even if the line was difficult to find, it seems to that>> just because we were unable to agree exactly where it is>> doesn’t imply that we’d be unable to agree when a metric is>> way over it. I can’t imagine anyone ever proposing a Has No>> CamelCase metric in all seriousness and without getting...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg10997.html Making CPAN ratings easy (was Re: CPAN Ratings and the problem ofchoice) by Paul Fenwick- June 30, 2008 CC&39;ed to rethinking-cpan, since I assume it&39;s halfway relevant. If not, let me know, and I&39;ll get out of your face. Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:> Why are people not rating modulesBecause rating modules is a monumental pain in the arse.== The CPAN Ratings Way ==Let&39;s pretend you&39;re J. Average Hacker. You&39;ve popped over to CPAN because it provides a nice way of reading the documentation on a module you&39;ve just started using, let&39;s say Moose. Here&39;s the webpage you..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg10996.html Re: The evil tpod.t recap by Eric Wilhelm- June 30, 2008 from David Cantrell on Monday 30 June 2008 16:04:>> If you truly have the Evil Cargo-Culted tpod.t (which has been>> previously discussed here and elsewhere), it fails spuriously for>> some users.>>Is this The Evil>>http:drhyde.cvs.sourceforge.netcheckoutdrhydeperlmodulesClass->CanBeAtpod.trevision=1.1&content-type=text%2FplainYes. If you (or a co-maintainer) ever accidentally push a release from a machine without a Test::Pod and your pod has errors, any...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/06/msg10995.html |