perl.perlpoint...pp2html: template thoughts by Jochen Stenzel- April 27, 2002 Hello,for the templates of pp2html, I had a look at the HTML::Templatemodule. I think it is definitely one of the modules to be taken intoaccount and only needs a few prerequisites.But there might be other options like the Template::Toolkit which seemsto be the most powerful alternative, providing even the evaluation ofembedded Perl code. So I suggest the following (first thoughts fordiscussion, by no means final or complete): Let&39;s abstract the current pp2html output generator code in order.http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg66.html PerlPoint::Package 0.37 released by Jochen Stenzel- April 27, 2002 Hello,I just published a new version of PerlPoint::Package via CPAN. It is amaintenance update that does not require new converters - so documentsand converters do not need to be updated. (Incompatible changes arejust extensions not affecting existing software.)0.37 was tested successfully both with perl 5.005 and perl 5.6.What&39;s new Here are the highlights: INCLUDE takes care of search pathes now. For easy use with existing converters, pathes can be set up by an environment variable...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg65.html Re: Is perl5.005 still a need by Jochen Stenzel- April 17, 2002 Hello,a few answers I got privately indicate that in business environmentsperl 5.005 ist still in use. So ok, we&39;ll try to continue 5.005support.Fortunately, I figured out why the tests failed under 5.005 ;-)Greetings Jochenhttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg64.html Re: DocBook converter (was: Is perl5.005 still a need) by Jochen Stenzel- April 17, 2002 >By the way, I&39;m starting to look into DocBook. Is there already a>pp2docbook aroundNot yet. I&39;ll post this part back to the list as well, as it might beof interest for other people, too. I&39;m not using DocBook yet, but ifsomeone is interested in implementing such a converter, I&39;d be glad tosupport this.Greetings Jochenhttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg63.html Is perl5.005 still a need by Jochen Stenzel- April 16, 2002 Hello,I&39;m working on a new (and almost ready) package version and justrecognized that the test suite fails under 5.005. ;-( The code seems towork slightly different in perl 5.6 and perl 5.005.That&39;s the background of my question: we are still trying to supportperl 5.005, and I&39;d really like to continue this. On the other hand, itbecomes more and more difficult and expensive to do so. So what do youthink: while perl 5.8 is already announced, is version 5.005 still aneed What versions...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg62.html Re: Tree Applet by Jochen Stenzel- April 6, 2002 >Is the source for the tree applet available anywhere>>I&39;m finding it is horribly unstable in Netscape (4.7): it will>only run for a few minutes before locking>Netscape up completely.I noticed this under Linux as well. Under Solaris, it runs for weeks(and then Netscape usually crashes for unknown reasons, possibly theapplet is involved as well because it is typically running multiply....)So, the source can be grabbed from www.naturallyj.com. The old treeapplet provided in...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg61.html Tree Applet by Robert Inder- April 6, 2002 Is the source for the tree applet available anywhereI&39;m finding it is horribly unstable in Netscape (4.7): it willonly run for a few minutes before lockingNetscape up completely.Java in Netscape 4.7 (Unix) is hardly stable, but this isso bad as to be unusable. Since a colleague and I have developed a number of appletswhich are less bad than this, I&39;d like to look at whatis going on to see if we can sort it...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perlpoint/2002/04/msg60.html |