Re: APIs will make JVM porting easier (was Re: the mutantbeast (was Re: Backtracking through the source)) by Dan Sugalski- December 5, 2000 At 06:28 PM 12200 -0500, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:>Dan Sugalski <dansidhe.org> wrote:>> > It&39;s more than just the parser. You&39;ve got the bytecode compiler and> > possibly the optimizer as well, and they&39;re probably going to be all, or> > mostly, C. On the other hand they might not have any internal hooks for> > perl code to wedge into, in which case they&39;re just black boxes and not of> > much concern.>>This is exactly why I have been...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals.api.embed/2000/12/msg2.html APIs will make JVM porting easier (was Re: the mutant beast (was Re: Backtracking through the source)) by Bradley M. Kuhn- December 2, 2000 Dan Sugalski <dansidhe.org> wrote:> It&39;s more than just the parser. You&39;ve got the bytecode compiler and> possibly the optimizer as well, and they&39;re probably going to be all, or> mostly, C. On the other hand they might not have any internal hooks for> perl code to wedge into, in which case they&39;re just black boxes and not of> much concern.This is exactly why I have been pushing for the internals APIs to be veryclearly defined. I expect to have to replace...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals.api.embed/2000/12/msg1.html |