perl.qpsmtpd...Re: require_resolvable_fromhost bug by Charlie Brady- June 12, 2008 On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Jan Völkers wrote:> Jose Luis Martinez schrieb:>>> I consider this a bug, as leaving fake MX records is a known antispam>> technique, and after all, the domain is resolvable if you have at least >> The known antispam technique is not having unresolvable MXs, it is having > _unreachable_ MXs. Really different, i thinkThe fact remains that a single unresolvable MX might just be a mistake, and doesn&39;t imply that the mail is unreplyable,...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8104.html Re: require_resolvable_fromhost bug by Jan Vlkers- June 12, 2008 Jose Luis Martinez schrieb:> I consider this a bug, as leaving fake MX records is a known antispam > technique, and after all, the domain is resolvable if you have at least The known antispam technique is not having unresolvable MXs, it is having _unreachable_ MXs. Really different, i thinkJanhttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8103.html require_resolvable_fromhost bug by Jose Luis Martinez- June 12, 2008 Hi,We&39;re using the require_resolvable_fromhost plugin, and have seen that there is a bug in it. MAIL FROM commands with legitimate domains where getting rejected as not resolvable.The bug has been tracked down to domains that have zone files with unresolvable MX records.example.com. 3600 IN MX 10 fakeserver.example.com.example.com. 3600 IN MX 20 mail.example.com.example.com. 3600 IN MX 30 anotherfakeserver.example.com.The plugin tries to resolve every MX record in the list (to see if it has.http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8102.html Re: rcptto_vrfy by Matt Sergeant- June 10, 2008 On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:59:43 +0200, Jan Völkers wrote:> Hello,> > has anyone written a rcptto_vrfy plugin> > I set up a new mx in a hurry and now i am searching for a nice > check_rcpt plugin. Actually i am using only the smtp_forward plugin > which has two disadvantages:> > - it checks _after_ queueing the whole mail.> > - it rejects legitimate mails: If one sends mails to different users > in the same domain with one correct and one incorrect address...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8101.html rcptto_vrfy by Jan Vlkers- June 10, 2008 Hello,has anyone written a rcptto_vrfy pluginI set up a new mx in a hurry and now i am searching for a nice check_rcpt plugin. Actually i am using only the smtp_forward plugin which has two disadvantages:- it checks _after_ queueing the whole mail.- it rejects legitimate mails: If one sends mails to different users in the same domain with one correct and one incorrect address also the legitimate receiver will not get any mail as it is completely rejected.I would appreciate a simple plugin that..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8100.html DKIM plugin at Matthew Harrell by zombilius- June 6, 2008 Original source:http:alecto.bittwiddlers.comfilesqpsmtpddkimsignhttp:alecto.bittwiddlers.comfilesqpsmtpddkimcheckAdd config file for several domain support: http:chaos.ks.uapubdkimsignhttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8099.html Re: Release by Hanno Hecker- June 4, 2008 On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:11:21 -0400Guy Hulbert <gwhulberteol.ca> wrote:> On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 19:47 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote:> > On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:10:13 -0400> > Guy Hulbert <gwhulberteol.ca> wrote:> > > Actually, what I meant by &39;pointer&39; was somewhere prominent on the wiki> > > before the release as I&39;ve seen many questions about -async and &39;> > > notes&39; on the list. However, I suppose that the wiki already has>...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8098.html Re: Release by Guy Hulbert- June 4, 2008 On Wed, 2008-04-06 at 19:47 +0200, Hanno Hecker wrote:> On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:10:13 -0400> Guy Hulbert <gwhulberteol.ca> wrote:> > Actually, what I meant by &39;pointer&39; was somewhere prominent on the wiki> > before the release as I&39;ve seen many questions about -async and &39;> > notes&39; on the list. However, I suppose that the wiki already has> Write a .pod about it and we&39;ll include it. I wrote the plugins.podHaving looked at the wiki, for which I.http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8097.html Re: Release by Hanno Hecker- June 4, 2008 On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:10:13 -0400Guy Hulbert <gwhulberteol.ca> wrote:> Actually, what I meant by &39;pointer&39; was somewhere prominent on the wiki> before the release as I&39;ve seen many questions about -async and &39;> notes&39; on the list. However, I suppose that the wiki already hasWrite a .pod about it and we&39;ll include it. I wrote the plugins.podto find out what&39;s really possible and what not (improvements are alwayswelcome) ;-)> something already as I...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8096.html Per plugin hook timeouts by Hanno Hecker- June 4, 2008 Hi,this is a first version of a per plugin hook timeout. It seems to workwell for me, but I&39;ve never had the problem of plugins running toolong... Basically this is an advanced version of what Robert suggestedhere: http:www.nntp.perl.orggroupperl.qpsmtpd200802msg7781.htmlThe "timeout" plugin configures the timeouts, a timeout of 0 disables atimeout (the default). Any wishes, comments, tests where the long running plugin problemappears, ...One likely change in a later version would..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2008/06/msg8095.html |