Search   Feed   Browse   Add
Feed items 1 - 5 of 5 for May 2004

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

The Internet is profoundly changing how scientists work and publish. New business models are being tested by publishers, including open access, in which the author pays and content is free to the user. This ongoing web focus will explore current trends and future possibilities. Each week, the website will publish specially commissioned insights and analysis from leading scientists, librarians, publishers and other stakeholders, as well as key links, and articles from our archive. All content is.

Not so quiet on a Western front - May 28, 2004

In negotiations with Reed Elsevier, the University of California libraries recently held out over a license to selected titles in its Science Direct package until a price was agreed that allowed, at least temporarily, the arrest of the spectacular inflation in price over the past few years. This experience has been illuminating to me as a university administrator and a librarian, and informs my thinking on the economics of scholarly publishing set out below.
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/23.html

Can 'author pays' journals compete with 'reader pays' - May 17, 2004

Publishers of scholarly journals currently obtain most of their revenue from subscription fees charged to libraries and individual users. We call this the 'Reader Pays' pricing model. An alternative pricing method has recently emerged, in which publishers collect their revenue by charging significant publication fees to authors, and then supply their content over the Internet, at no cost to readers. We call this the 'Author Pays' pricing model. 'Open Access, Author Pays' publishing is...
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/22.html

The green and the gold roads to Open Access - May 17, 2004

The crisis in university journal budgets first brought to light the problem of access to published research. But the problems of affordability and access, although often confused, are distinct. We describe here a practical solution to the access problem.
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html

Can Open Access be viable The Institute of Physics' experience - May 7, 2004

The Institute of Physics (IOP) has considerable experience in Open Access, through its New Journal of Physics (NJP), This Month's Papers, and IOP Select. Launched at the end of 1998, several years before the current Open Access movement, NJP is our highest profile venture in the area. A joint initiative with the German Physical Society, NJP involved several dimensions: to publish an on-line-only journal, of high scientific quality, with rigorous peer review, covering all physics, under a...
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/20.html

Do Open Access journals have impact - May 7, 2004

At Thomson ISI, we have followed debates over Open Access to scholarly literature with great interest. This is partly because our mission, best incarnated today in the Web of Science, is to help researchers find and access quality, relevant information wherever it is published. It is also because the journal-level metrics, such as the Impact Factor and Immediacy Index, for which Thomson ISI has become known, have assumed importance in these discussions.
http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/19.html
Available Archives
- March (8 items)
- April (10 items)
- May (5 items)
- June (3 items)
- July (3 items)
Sponsored Links
© 2008 FeedCapsule.com  |  Contact