perl.pod-people...Re: perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by Shade_Jon- February 25, 2007 On Feb 15, 3:42 pm, marek.rouc...infineon.com (Marek Rouchal) wrote:> YehudaBerlingerj...actcom.co.il> => claimed in 2003 to have an improved perlindexLet me know if I can help. New email is shadejon on gmail.Yehudahttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1308.html Re: perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by Hakim Cassimally- February 19, 2007 Hi,I&39;ve added Pod-Perldoc to my repository: http:greenokapi.netsvncodePod-Perldocwhich includes the 2 patches rgs passed me from bleadperl. If anyonewould like access to the repo, give me a shout.I notice that the test suite doesn&39;t cover a great deal. I&39;ll try towork on that - if anyone has any suggestions or experience on tryingto portable test perldoc, please let me know!Cheerio,HakimOn 150207, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarezgmail.com> wrote:> On 150207, Hakim...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1307.html RE: perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by marek.rouchal- February 15, 2007 Note: perlindex is used by Tk::Pod, adding a very nicefull text search capability. Make sure you align anyAPI changes with SREZIC. I was considering an overhaulof perlindex myself, but found no time so far. Onespecific hint: Pod::Index does a poor stripping ofthe B<> I<> etc. markup - it would be much safer tolet Pod::Simple do the parsing in order to just getthe text content from the POD without any markup.In the recent past, there were more people dealingwith Pod::Index:Ivan...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1305.html Re: perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez- February 15, 2007 On 150207, Hakim Cassimally <hakim.cassimallygmail.com> wrote:> Hi Rafael,>> Just done on Pause:>> Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc.Not sure who can use that pause account. What&39;s your pause id > I&39;ve noted the 2 patches you mention - 26191 is the POD2IT> patch, great. I&39;ll look at these asap.>> Should I be patching against my own repository copy of> the Pod::Perldoc tree, or is there a central one I should ask> for access toThe only...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1306.html Re: perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by Hakim Cassimally- February 15, 2007 Hi Rafael,Just done on Pause:Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::BaseTo.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::GetOptsOO.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::ToChecker.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::ToMan.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::ToNroff.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::ToPod.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::ToRtf.Added P5P to co-maintainers of Pod::Perldoc::ToText.Added..http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1304.html Re: perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez- February 15, 2007 "Hakim Cassimally" wrote in perl.pod-people :> Hi,>> After Sean&39;s message below, I&39;ve volunteered to> spend some time giving some love and care to> perldoc.>> If anyone would like co-maint, let me know!P5P would like ! perldoc being the CPAN backport of acore utility, it&39;s important to work with the perl5 porters.> In the short term I want to get my head round the> code, and work through the RT queue bugs and look> at the wishlist items.Could you.http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1303.html perldoc maintenance (was : Re: perldoc: deal with 2nd etc. arguments) by Hakim Cassimally- February 13, 2007 Hi,After Sean&39;s message below, I&39;ve volunteered tospend some time giving some love and care toperldoc.If anyone would like co-maint, let me know!In the short term I want to get my head round thecode, and work through the RT queue bugs and lookat the wishlist items.After that... things I&39;m keen on looking at integratingare the POD2IT patches for localised Perldocs, andthe Pod::Index work. So, if anyone has thoughts onthose, or other improvements, please let me...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1302.html Re: podlatorsPod::Simple backwards compatibility by chromatic- February 11, 2007 On Saturday 10 February 2007 09:33, Russ Allbery wrote:> + my $diamondop = ref($source) = (:GLOBFileHandleIO::w+)$> + eval tied $source ;Hm, does this disallow subclassing any of those packages Would checking fileno() be better How about using Scalar::Util::blessed() instead of ref()-- chttp://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1301.html Re: podlatorsPod::Simple backwards compatibility by Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes- February 10, 2007 > On Saturday 10 February 2007 09:33, Russ Allbery wrote:>>> + my $diamondop = ref($source) = (:GLOBFileHandleIO::w+)$>> + eval tied $source ;>> Hm, does this disallow subclassing any of those packages Would checking> fileno() be betterNo, it&39;s just checking whether to use <> or ->getline. For subclassesit should use getline.> How about using Scalar::Util::blessed() instead of> ref()There&39;s certainly room to do it better, but I was only...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1300.html Re: podlatorsPod::Simple backwards compatibility by Russ Allbery- February 10, 2007 Nicholas Clark <nickccl4.org> writes:> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:14:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:>> Nicholas Clark <nickccl4.org> writes:>>> Did anything come of this>>> I was wondering what subtle but known differences exist between the>>> behaviour of the POD modules in 5.8.8, and those in blead.>> I was going to look at Yitzchak&39;s message in detail with an eye to>> implementing a compatibility layer in the podlators modules,...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.pod-people/2007/02/msg1299.html |