- November 22, 2003
We Have Moved Permanently
Groklaw has moved. We are here now. Please join us there. We outgrew Radio and thankfully Ibiblio offered to host us. There we have bandwidth galore, and software that can handle hundreds of comments per article. I had a wonderful experience with Radio blogging, and I was sorry to have to move, but Groklaw's amazing popularity made it necessary. For those of you who subscribe to the RSS feed, please come to the new site and subscribe there. I've been...
http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/2003/11/22.html#a385
- November 4, 2003
SCOForum Slides vs. SCO's Memorandum -- A Closer Look
In SCO's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to IBM's Motion to Compel Discovery, there is one section entitled "IBM's Characterization of the Presentation at the SCO Trade Show is False and Misleading." Let's examine this one paragraph and see if that is true or if the shoe is on the other foot. In order to do that, we'll be comparing what SCO wrote in its Memorandum with the slides in SCO's SCOForum...
http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/2003/11/04.html#a384
- November 4, 2003
SCO Tells IBM: No, You Show Your Code First
It's time to analyze SCO's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to IBM's Motion to Compel Discovery, which we posted as text yesterday. If I had to characterize it in a brief sentence or two, the sentence would be that SCO tells the court, "How are we supposed to know what code IBM misappropriated It's up to them to prove our case for us. It's not for us to hand over the code; it's up to them to show us every bit of code...
http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/2003/11/04.html#a383
- November 4, 2003
SCO's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to IBM's Motion to Compel Discovery
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to IBM's Motion to Compel Discovery
October 23, 2003
The SCO Group ("SCO") submits this memorandum of law in opposition to International Business Machines Corporation's ("IBM") Motion to Compel Discovery.
INTRODUCTION
It has been said that things have both an ostensible and a real reason. Ostensibly, IBM filed its motion to Compel to force SCO to answer...
http://radio.weblogs.com/0120124/2003/11/04.html#a382
|
|