perl.qa...Re: Making CPAN ratings easy (was Re: CPAN Ratings and the problem of choice) by Eric Wilhelm- July 1, 2008 from Rick Fisk on Tuesday 01 July 2008 00:09:>Number of downloads -> perhaps this could be compared to various release versions of the>module to keep it pertinent.You can&39;t count the downloads (we don&39;t have any control over or feedback from the mirrors the way sourceforge does.)See debian&39;s popcon for an alternative scheme where opt-in clients push installed package+version back to a central point.--Eric-- "Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/07/msg11004.html Re: Making CPAN ratings easy (was Re: CPAN Ratings and the problemof choice) by Rick Fisk- July 1, 2008 Paul Fenwick wrote:> CC&39;ed to rethinking-cpan, since I assume it&39;s halfway relevant. If > not, let me know, and I&39;ll get out of your face. >> Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:>>> Why are people not rating modules>> Because rating modules is a monumental pain in the arse.>> == The CPAN Ratings Way ==>> Let&39;s pretend you&39;re J. Average Hacker. You&39;ve popped over to CPAN > because it provides a nice way of reading the documentation on a >...http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qa/2008/07/msg11003.html |